Idea Screening
The first part of this blog is going to discus and define
the concept of the term Idea Screening, the second part will go on to show how
I have screened my ideas and what tools were used.
According to Law, 2009 idea screening is the process of “screening
new-product ideas in order to identify and develop good ideas and drop poor
ones as soon as possible”. McDaniel, Lamb
and Hair, 2011 describe the process as a way to eliminate ideas that have been
proposed by discarding ideas that don’t fit the organisations aims and goals.
Whereas Kotler and Armstrong, 2012 suggest that Idea
screening is only a basic filtering process but ensures large costs are
avoided.
These definitions suggest that the process of idea screening
is to filter out the ideas that don’t have the potential to work, the stage is
important in the new product development process because it helps companies
save lots of resources, most importantly time and money. If the company can cut
down the number of ideas and focus all their resources and efforts into one
idea it is more likely to be successful than if they try to split their
resources of a number of ideas.
To screen ideas companies often set a range of criteria
questions and score each idea in relation to the how they meet the criteria.
These questions can be anything from, cost of production for the company? Size
of the target market? Is it technically feasible to manufacture / provide?
These results can be easily compared and calculated using a
decision making matrix, this helps to rank ideas clearly and helps to indicate
the better business idea over the idea that people may favour originally as you
can weight each criteria on what’s most important to the company.
This video link shows how to make a decision making matrix
on Excel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy4cX34U87Y
I used this tool to help me decide on which idea I should
chose and follow through with. I used the Criteria of cost to provide the
service, Patentability of the new sport concept, Profit potential of the sport,
the health and safety risk of playing the sport and the accessibility to the
public. As you can see in Appendix (A) each category has been weighted between
1 and 3 which helps indicate the importance of each category score. Each idea
is then scored 1-100 in each category and the matrix creates a weighted score
and ranks the ideas highest to lowest.
The matrix has indicated to me that my Archball Idea is the
best idea I have come up with and that it should be the most commercially
successful out of the three.
Appendix
A
References
·
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2012) Principles of Marketing 14th
Editionn. London: Pearson Education.
·
Mcdaniel, C.D. Lamb, C.W. and Hair J.F. (2011) Introduction to Marketing 11th
Edition. Ohio: South-Western
Cengage Learning.
·
Law , J (2009) A Dictionary of Business and
Management 5th Edition, Oxford :Oxford University Press
Received
ReplyDeleteYou start quite well by establishing the terms of reference through definition for this stage of the NPD process.You do need to be more specific in the second section by using an identifiable example i.e. T20 cricket. You have implemented a suitable approach to the task of Idea Screening, as evidenced by the matrix. You have included some solid decision criteria, but I will await to see your development of the new sport format. Do include page numbers in text for direct citations as you would in any other essay and brackets around dates of reference sources.
ReplyDelete58%
ReplyDelete